Accurate adult age at
death is basic to skeletal biology - to palaeodemography, to
palaeopathology, to
studies of dental pathology and attrition:
if we cannot estimate adult
age
accurately, we are in big trouble!

- 1985 Pubic symphysis
age distributions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
68: 281-299
it is the methods of age
assessment, rather than the characteristics of skeletal samples, which
determine age estimations (link)
erratum: page 297 17(0.223)
- 1992
Paleodemography:
problems and techniques. In S.R. Saunders and M.A. Katzenberg (eds.), Skeletal
Biology
of
Past
Peoples:
Research
Methods, pp. 189-224. New York:
Wiley-Liss
we need increased emphasis
on detailed studies of dentitions for adult age assessment and a clear
idea of the limitations of palaeodemography
erratum:
pages 216-217 r =
should not be percentage
- 1993 On paradox and
osteology. Current Anthropology 34(4): 434-439
reaction to a statement
that
adult age assessment is no longer an important issue in osteology
(link)
- 1994 Birth rates and
bones. In A. Herring and L. Chan (eds.), Strength in Diversity: a
Reader in Physical Anthropology Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press,
pp. 155-185
using ethnohistory to test
whether skeletal biologists can make useful estimates of birth rates
(link)
- 2000 Building the
bases for paleodemographic analysis: adult age determination. In M.A.
Katzenberg and S.R. Saunders (eds.), Biological Anthropology of the
Human Skeleton, pp. 407-456. New York: John Wiley and Sons
I was asked to write a
paper
on assessing the age at death of adults: I propose a new way of
thinking about age changes, and look at suggestions that have been made
for dealing with problems of adult age assessment and taphonomy
(reply
to criticism)
- 2000 Ethnohistory
and
osteology in southern Ontario. In The Entangled Past: Integrating
History and Archaeology. Papers of the 30th Annual Chacmool
Conference Calgary: Archaeological Association, University of Calgary
using ethnohistory to show
that skeletal biologists have underestimated longevity
link
NB: Table 2 footnote a,
page
174
notes
that
the
Carrier's
(1958)
formula
for
r (rate of
increase) contained an error, and that I calculate r
differently from date of the 27th Chacmool Conference in November, 1997
- 2002 Jackes, M. Review
of R.D. Hoppa and J.W. Vaupel (eds.)
Palaeodemography: Age
Distributions from Skeletal Samples. American Journal of Human Biology
14 (6): 792-795 (link)
- 2003 Jackes, M. Testing
a Method: Paleodemography and
proportional fitting. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 121:385-386 (link)
- Jackes, M., M.
Roksandic
and C.
Meiklejohn The demography of the Djerdap Mesolithic/Neolithic
transition. In Clive Bonsall, Vasile Boroneant and Ivana Radovanovic
(eds.), The Iron Gates in Prehistory: new perspectives. BAR
International Series 1893. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 77-88. (Djerdap)
one of several papers on
the
question of whether it is possible to discern differences in fertility
between the Mesolithic and the Neolithic in Europe
- Jackes, M. and C.
Meiklejohn 2004
Building a method for the study of the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition
in Portugal. In M. Budja (ed.), Neolithic Studies 11, Documenta
Praehistorica 31: 89-111. (Ljubljana)
looks especially at the
particular problems presented by Cabeço da Arruda, a famous site
of the Portuguese Mesolithic
link to
historical
demography
site
link to
palaeodemography
site
Back to
home